New byteflow blog is now active (as per chrism's recent email), just need paul
to skin it using deliverance?

On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 14:02 +0000, Chris McDonough wrote:
> Chris McDonough <chrism@plope.com> added the comment:
> 
> Tim Knapp (duffyd) volunteered to help set one up, so we'll go with whatever he 
> eventually chooses (the only limitation I expressed was that it would be WSGI).

Yes, I'm just about there. The process of selection/testing wasn't too
bad actually but /me trying to get the thing integrated with buildout
slowed me down (and my Repoze speech yesterday).

I'll be back onto it from next week and report back then.

Thanks,
Tim

> 
> Paul Everitt wrote:
> > Paul Everitt <paul@agendaless.com> added the comment:
> > 
> > We could get commenting with, probably, 2 hours of work on pyxblosxom.
> > 
> > On the former, is Plone 3 enough?  Martin Aspelli, for example, seems  
> > to have a decent-enough blog.
> > 
> > I suspect that the repoze.org blog isn't something that we want to  
> > spend a lot of time getting running, correct?
> > 
> > --Paul
> > 
> > On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:31 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
> > 
> >> New submission from Chris McDonough <chrism@plope.com>:
> >>
> >> We need a new blog backend that supports posting entries through the  
> >> web as well as
> >> commenting.
> >>
> >> ----------
> >> messages: 88
> >> nosy: chrism
> >> priority: feature
> >> status: in-progress
> >> title: New blog backend
> >>
> >> __________________________________
> >> Repoze Bugs <bugs@bugs.repoze.org>
> >> <http://bugs.repoze.org/issue31>
> >> __________________________________
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Repoze-dev mailing list
> >> Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org
> >> http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
> > 
> > __________________________________
> > Repoze Bugs <bugs@bugs.repoze.org>
> > <http://bugs.repoze.org/issue31>
> > __________________________________
> > 
> > 
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Repoze-dev mailing list
> > Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org
> > http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
> 
> __________________________________
> Repoze Bugs <bugs@bugs.repoze.org>
> <http://bugs.repoze.org/issue31>
> __________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> Repoze-dev mailing list
> Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org
> http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev

Tim Knapp (duffyd) volunteered to help set one up, so we'll go with whatever he 
eventually chooses (the only limitation I expressed was that it would be WSGI).

Paul Everitt wrote:
> Paul Everitt <paul@agendaless.com> added the comment:
> 
> We could get commenting with, probably, 2 hours of work on pyxblosxom.
> 
> On the former, is Plone 3 enough?  Martin Aspelli, for example, seems  
> to have a decent-enough blog.
> 
> I suspect that the repoze.org blog isn't something that we want to  
> spend a lot of time getting running, correct?
> 
> --Paul
> 
> On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:31 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
> 
>> New submission from Chris McDonough <chrism@plope.com>:
>>
>> We need a new blog backend that supports posting entries through the  
>> web as well as
>> commenting.
>>
>> ----------
>> messages: 88
>> nosy: chrism
>> priority: feature
>> status: in-progress
>> title: New blog backend
>>
>> __________________________________
>> Repoze Bugs <bugs@bugs.repoze.org>
>> <http://bugs.repoze.org/issue31>
>> __________________________________
>> _______________________________________________
>> Repoze-dev mailing list
>> Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org
>> http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
> 
> __________________________________
> Repoze Bugs <bugs@bugs.repoze.org>
> <http://bugs.repoze.org/issue31>
> __________________________________
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Repoze-dev mailing list
> Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org
> http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev

We could get commenting with, probably, 2 hours of work on pyxblosxom.

On the former, is Plone 3 enough?  Martin Aspelli, for example, seems  
to have a decent-enough blog.

I suspect that the repoze.org blog isn't something that we want to  
spend a lot of time getting running, correct?

--Paul

On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:31 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:

>
> New submission from Chris McDonough <chrism@plope.com>:
>
> We need a new blog backend that supports posting entries through the  
> web as well as
> commenting.
>
> ----------
> messages: 88
> nosy: chrism
> priority: feature
> status: in-progress
> title: New blog backend
>
> __________________________________
> Repoze Bugs <bugs@bugs.repoze.org>
> <http://bugs.repoze.org/issue31>
> __________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> Repoze-dev mailing list
> Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org
> http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev

We need a new blog backend that supports posting entries through the web as well as 
commenting.